Skip to content
Home » Why France is gearing up for a tradition warfare with america | Agnès Poirier

Why France is gearing up for a tradition warfare with america | Agnès Poirier


Do you bear in mind essentially the most Homeric of world commerce negotiations, referred to as the Uruguay spherical, which passed off between 1986 and 1994? I used to be a youngster then and I keep in mind that spherical of the Basic Settlement on Tariffs and Commerce (Gatt) vividly.

I had taken to studying the austere Le Monde day by day and bear in mind the uncouth Jack Valenti, head of the Movement Image Affiliation in Hollywood, who significantly despised European movie administrators for pleading with their governments to exclude cinema, and the humanities normally, from the negotiations. Valenti roared again: “Tradition is like chewing-gum, a product like another.” On the time, France’s President François Mitterrand led the rebel and, sphinx-like, handled the like of Valenti with hauteur. He retorted: “The thoughts’s creations are not any mere commodities and cannot be handled as such.”

The distinction sums up the opposing views: the US considers cinema and the humanities as leisure industries making income; Europe considers tradition because the product of concepts that transcend a strict industrial worth. Within the late 80s, France coined the notion of “cultural exception” which has since morphed into the much less arrogant-sounding “cultural variety”, a precept adopted in October 2005 by Unesco as a legally binding conference handed by 185 states towards two. The naysayers had been the US and Israel.

Twenty years later, we’re again at it with the opening of talks for a brand new transatlantic commerce settlement. The issue is, this time Europe is in a weaker state. France might have warned this week (paywalled hyperlink) that it’s going to not begin negotiation if cultural industries will not be excluded from commerce talks, making its level with a letter signed by 16 European tradition ministers, however will it prevail as soon as once more? Nothing is much less certain. To make the scenario even trickier than in 1993, evidently the EU fee supremo, José Manuel Barroso, is taking part in a double recreation. Desperate to please Washington – he’s mentioned to wish to succeed Ban Ki-moon on the UN, he’s telling the Europeans to, as we are saying in French, put water of their wine, ie pacify the People. Nonetheless, Barroso dangers showing incoherent, saying final month, “we must always not exclude the audio-visual sector in negotiations with the US,” earlier than including, “on the identical time, we should make it clear that the cultural exception isn’t negotiable.” Go determine.

In the meantime, Barack Obama and his administration are flexing their muscle tissue, saying: “To perform an formidable and complete settlement, we shouldn’t be carving out points earlier than the negotiation even begins.” As usually earlier than in these testosterone-filled commerce negotiations, these are sometimes simply phrases, methods of appearing robust. However not solely.

The notion of cultural variety for Europe is a vital one. It isn’t, as entrepreneurs would have it, a rear-guard response from an previous continent – it’s the battle for a wealthy mental and inventive debate by which profit-making shouldn’t be the one consideration. France’s system of subsidies for the humanities and quotas for European movies on its screens has for many years allowed a big public to find and embrace completely different factors of view. In France, American movies have “solely” a 50-60% market share, in contrast with 90% within the UK. Why would we wish to see extra American movies, just because they’ve the monetary energy to impose themselves in our multiplexes, when there are gems to be found coming from different international locations, albeit financially fragile and which need assistance to get to us?

Cinema isn’t the one thorn. Ought to we simply wait whereas Amazon provides the kiss of demise to impartial bookshops in Europe by way of dumping practices (whereas failing to pay taxes), or ought to we help these impartial booksellers who fulfil an essential function in society? The French authorities has pledged, since March, €18m to the e-book business. Is that this ugly protectionism or a measure of public sanity?

Throughout every week when China raised taxes on European wine as retaliation towards Europe’s resistance on the problem of low-cost photo voltaic panels coming from China, I might say, let wine fend for itself and allow us to defend cultural variety.


Supply hyperlink